<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Actionscript 3: part 3!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kelvinluck.com/2005/10/actionscript-3-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kelvinluck.com/2005/10/actionscript-3-part-3/</link>
	<description>a stroke of luck</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.kelvinluck.com/2005/10/actionscript-3-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 23:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nb.kelvinluck.com/?p=43#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Good point Jon&#8230; I didn&#8217;t think that would have much effect on such a simple example but just tried it and found it had a very noticable effect on my machine&#8230; Infact it changed the &#8220;feel&#8221; of the example quite alot and it seemed to lose some &#8220;fluidity&#8221;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hard to explain but try it on the code above and you might see what I mean (or maybe you will see what I mean without cacheAsBitmap if your computer is faster than mine!).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, amazing the difference it made and would definitely recommend it in situations where you were rendering bigger images than this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the feedback :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Jon&#8230; I didn&#8217;t think that would have much effect on such a simple example but just tried it and found it had a very noticable effect on my machine&#8230; Infact it changed the &#8220;feel&#8221; of the example quite alot and it seemed to lose some &#8220;fluidity&#8221;...</p>
<p>Hard to explain but try it on the code above and you might see what I mean (or maybe you will see what I mean without cacheAsBitmap if your computer is faster than mine!).</p>
<p>Anyway, amazing the difference it made and would definitely recommend it in situations where you were rendering bigger images than this.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.kelvinluck.com/2005/10/actionscript-3-part-3/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nb.kelvinluck.com/?p=43#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Possibly add cacheAsBitmap = true in the MosaicTile constructor.  That might speed it up quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly add cacheAsBitmap = true in the MosaicTile constructor.  That might speed it up quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.292 seconds -->

